2026 Vanguard Summit: A Global Convening of Leaders on Preventing and Ending Homelessness

Bringing Vanguard Cities Together

We recently hosted the 2026 IGH Vanguard Summit in London, bringing together city leaders and global partners in the framework of our Vanguard Program. The IGH Summit convened representatives from 12 cities, including Adelaide, Buenos Aires, Cape Town, Glasgow, Greater Manchester, Lisbon, Montevideo, Santiago, São Paulo, Sydney, Tshwane, Ulaanbaatar, and partners from across the United Kingdom.

Welcoming the Vanguard representatives, Baroness Louise Casey of Blackstock emphasized that “the importance of the city’s work is as important to us today as it was in 2017 [when the Vanguard Program was created], and so the more we can learn from each other and from action in reality the better.”

Alongside the IGH Summit, participants also attended Homewards’ three-year anniversary event and visited the local organization The Passage. Across two days of discussions, a clear message emerged: while homelessness looks different across contexts, the principles for preventing and ending it are consistent. Coordinated systems, housing-led approaches, prevention, data, lived experience, and collaboration across sectors were recurring themes in every conversation.

Below are major themes we heard throughout the Vanguard Summit:

1. Data and Definitions – Strengthening Measurement and Accountability

There is growing international momentum toward more consistent definitions and measurement of homelessness, alongside a stronger focus on tracking meaningful outcomes rather than outputs. This includes work at the United Nations to standardize definitions, and cities thinking through key performance indicators to track outcomes. Several places demonstrated the power of setting ambitious, measurable goals and alignment of systems around the outcomes that matter most to people experiencing homelessness. Discussions highlighted the growing potential of data and artificial intelligence to improve early intervention. We heard an important ethical debate around potentially biased or harmful personal data use and discussed the importance of using available data effectively.

2. Leadership and Collaboration – Driving Sustainable, Systems Change

Effective responses combine strong national leadership with local action, empowering communities and people with lived experience to shape policy and deliver targeted solutions. Successful systems are anchored in a shared vision, common data, and continuous improvement, enabling partners to coordinate their efforts and measure progress. Strengthening communication, information sharing, and referral pathways are critical to aligning services and ensuring people receive the support they need. Success also depends on broad partnerships that extend beyond one government department and homelessness services to partnerships across ministries and sectors including businesses, education, healthcare, carceral, and other sectors, particularly to strengthen homelessness prevention.

3. Prevention – Shifting Systems Away from Crisis

While prevention is now firmly embedded in the global conversation, homelessness systems remain heavily focused on emergency shelters and crisis responses. Shifting services to prevention-focused systems was a major theme of the Summit. Vanguard cities are at different stages of scaling prevention services, from pilots, to analyzing data to identify drivers and common risk factors of homelessness, to embedding in city and national plans. Scaling prevention requires shifting resources upstream, creating mechanisms to identify at-risk indivudals, investment in holistic, person-centered approaches to support at-risk individuals, such as strengthening access to secure employment, in order to ultimately reduce the risk of homelessness before it occurs.

4. Housing – Scaling Services and Supply

Housing-led responses are foundational to any homelessness system across the globe. Housing outcomes improved in cities when paired with healthcare, employment, education, social inclusion, and other wrap-around supports. An important element in improving housing stability for clients is integration, building relationships, and trust.   The challenge is to not create more institutions but a system that coordinates, empowers, and delivers. Discussions also highlighted the need to increase affordable housing supply, strengthen housing rights and protections, improve housing quality, expand Housing First and alternative housing options, and measure success through long-term housing stability and well-being rather than housing placement alone.

Despite diverse contexts, the Summit highlighted a shared commitment to preventing and ending homelessness. The event showcased diverse experiences, including those of First Nations communities, migrants and refugees, single-parent families, and adolescents. While important differences remain, there were striking similarities in the underlying challenges and the principles of effective responses. Throughout the Summit, participants underscored the value of learning from one another, adapting proven approaches to local contexts, and translating policy into practice.    Cities are powerful agents of change and they continue to demonstrate that meaningful progress on homelessness is possible, even when national trends are moving in the opposite direction.

Event Recap

Centralized Data and Cross-sector Collaboration

Session 1 of the Summit engaged delegates from Cape Town, São Paulo, Tshwane, and Sydney in a thoughtful conversation on how cities are centering data and collaboration to drive change. Representing the Australian Alliance to End Homelessness (AAEH), Katie Feeney discussed Sydney’s efforts to strengthen its By-Name-List and better allocate resources: “It was only when we focused on and supported communities that we started having an impact.”

Our newest Vanguard City, Cape Town, underscored the importance of a social approach to the homelessness response. “We work closely with social development partners because everyone plays a key role in addressing and ending homelessness,” said Megan Pangeni, Head of the Street People Programme at the City of Cape Town. Similarly, São Paulo highlighted how a social approach is helping the city understand and build trust with people experiencing homelessness, as explained by Barbara Piccirilli de Araujo from the Prefeitura Municipal de São Paulo. Based on its census data, the city has designed targeted programs for specific group populations.

Building on the theme of data and partnerships, Ntombikayise Zulu, Director of Community Impact at the City of Tshwane, described the city’s commitment to measuring and reporting on homelessness, noting that “if you see the progress that the city has made, you can clearly see the value of its long-standing partnership with IGH since 2018.”

Prevention and Systems Change

Despite being an emerging theme in the global conversation, effective preventive initiatives remain small scale and displaced in the priorities by emergency provision and crisis responses.

IGH Executive Director, Peter Mackie, emphasized that “people need support to make sure that homelessness does not happen again,” highlighting that the Five-Stage Typology presented “is for us to think about what we are doing” and reflect on how systems can better intervene before people experience homelessness.

In our second session, participants explored opportunities and challenges to improve homelessness prevention and housing responses. Alex Reid, Director of Homelessness Systems and Partnerships at the South Australian Department of Human Services, emphasized data-driven collaboration and the role of Advance to Zero in strengthening service coordination and reducing rough sleeping, but indicating that limited housing supply remains a key challenge.

María Fernanda Reyes, Deputy Secretary of Human Potential at the Ministry of Human Development and Habitat of Buenos Aires, highlighted how coordinated governance across public, private, third, and community sectors is crucial to respond to the growing complexity of homelessness. She stressed the need for pathways to employment, housing, and long-term stability, noting “we are the bridge between two worlds, those who are searching for jobs and those who can offer them because there are fewer social connections when you are the most vulnerable.”

A common theme across the discussion was the need to move beyond emergency responses toward coordinated systems that place people at the center. Building on this, João Marrana, Head of Rough Sleeping at the Câmara Municipal de Lisboa, shared how the city is rethinking its system not to create new institutions but to ensure existing ones work as a unified “model that coordinates, empowers, and delivers.”

Closing the session, Jaime Lavín, Chief of the National Street Office, Ministry of Social Development and Family of Chile, recognized the shared issue of a fragmented system. Lavín described Chile’s efforts to strengthen local leadership in coordinating housing, health, education, employment, and Housing First services, creating greater opportunities for prevention.

From Local to Global

Bridging local action with global learning, Session 3 explored how communities across the United Kingdom are driving change to prevent and end homelessness and what lessons can be adapted in cities around the world.

One panel featured Councillor Grace Williams, Leader of the London Borough of Waltham Forest and former Deputy Chair of London Councils; Stephen Aldridge CB, Chief Analyst, Chief Economist and Director of the Analysis and Data Directorate at the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government; and Matt Harrison, Deputy Chief Executive at Homeless Link. The conversation highlighted that prevention requires coordinated governance, up-to-date data, investment in social housing, and trust between communities and institutions.

The second panel brought together Michael Hughes, Principal of Homelessness and Temporary Accommodation at the Greater Manchester Combined Authority; Sarah Alonge from Homewards Lambeth; and Enrik Noka, Senior Economist at Westminster City Council. Together, they explored how prevention is most effective when it integrates housing with employment, mental health, income support, and social connections.

Human-rights Approaches

During the Summit, we also had the opportunity to hear from The UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Adequate Housing, Koldo Casla, who outlined his mandate and priorities, explaining that

[the right to adequate housing] “is about localizing the right to housing, making it meaningful at the local level, which is, at the end of the day, where it matters.”

Cities are therefore key agents in turning commitments into lasting change. In Scotland, a world-leading homelessness legislation establishes a legal right to accommodation, but this mandate must be matched by effective implementation. Councillor Allan Casey, City Convener for Workforce, Homelessness and Addiction Services of the City of Glasgow, reflected on the city’s success in keeping rough sleeping low through coordinated support, but noted that pressures on temporary accommodation and social housing supply.

In Uruguay, legal commitments to prevent deaths on the streets are in place, but meaningful implementation requires a comprehensive, rights-based approach. On the country’s situation, Fiorella Ciapessoni, from the Universidad de la República, highlighted the long-standing advocacy of people with lived experience of homelessness to reclaim and advance their rights, emphasizing that solutions require permanent housing programs, stronger prevention, and coordinated support for people leaving institutions, such as prisons, to break the cycle of homelessness.

Other contexts are working to strengthen legal protections and reform social welfare systems. Otgonbileg Yura, Director of the Social Welfare Policy Department at the Ministry of Family, Labor, and Social Protection of Mongolia, shared about their efforts to pass legislation that expands support to people experiencing homelessness. She emphasized the importance of assisting people leaving institutions and families at risk of homelessness, strengthening locally funded services, and incorporating lived experience.

Advancing the Global Response

“Preventing and ending homelessness is achievable, and the work at the city level is what really is driving the global movement to end homelessness, so the learning, the innovations, and the strategies that are happening at the city level and working up towards the national level are what we are looking to capture,” said IGH Program Director, Julia Wagner, during the 10th Vanguard Summit held in London.

With cities as agents of change, strengthened by supportive national leadership and international exchange, IGH remains committed to bringing global attention to the issue, fostering shared learning, and accelerating action.

We extend our heartfelt thanks to our city partners for their leadership, commitment, and tireless efforts to drive meaningful change and advance solutions to prevent and end homelessness in their communities. We are deeply grateful for their willingness to share their experiences, innovations, and lessons, strengthening a global movement to prevent and end homelessness. We also thank Homewards for their valued partnership and collaboration in bringing together leaders, practitioners, and communities to inspire action and accelerate progress.

Pillars to End and Prevent Homelessness: Lessons from Vanguard Cities

Pillars to End and Prevent Homelessness: Lessons from Vanguard Cities

Across the world, cities are grappling with the urgent challenge to end homelessness. While contexts vary, shaped by local housing markets, social protection systems, government structures, and social conditions, the core principles of how to prevent and end homelessness are the same. It is essential to shift systems from managing crises to more sustainable solutions. Across the globe, IGH Vanguard Cities are making efforts to end and prevent homelessness. Several of these initiatives are documented in our 2026 report, Vanguard Cities Case Studies: Initiatives to Prevent and End Homelessnesswhich seeks to use local insights to inform global approaches.  

The Case Studies Report documents approaches developed by eleven of our Vanguard Cities, including Buenos Aires, Chicago, Glasgow, Greater Manchester, Mongolia, Lisbon, Santiago, São Paulo, Sydney, Tshwane, and Uruguay. Drawing on these real-world examples, this blog explores key factors in the progress of the programs and international evidence, highlighting five necessary elements in the homelessness response to achieve a meaningful, lasting impact.

Five Pillars for Progress 

Prevention 

Prevention is key to ending homelessness. To be effective, it must address the underlying causes of homelessness and support people before they lose their homes. In practice, preventive strategies can include, but not be limited to:

  • Ending discharges into homelessness from institutions 
  • Preventing evictions
  • Providing rent and financial assistance
  • Facilitating access to housing, health, and support services 
  • Implementing Housing First and housing-led approaches  
  • Expanding affordable housing

IGH Case Studies highlight Greater Manchester’s Pathfinder service, which demonstrates the impact of prevention efforts with young people at risk of experiencing homelessness. This program shows how data-informed strategies, tailored to individual needs and integrated with housing and broader support services, can lead to more effective outcomes and interventions. 

Housing First 

In parallel, Vanguard Cities are rethinking how housing is delivered. The Housing First model has been internationally recognized as one of the best and most effective approaches in addressing and preventing homelessness. The model’s principles establish that there should be no conditions for receiving assistance and hold opposing views to the Staircase model, which involves successive stages that people must follow. Instead, Housing First offers immediate access to permanent housing, along with flexible, tailored, and person-centered support. 

The model’s principles have been adapted to local contexts in Santiago, Chile, and Lisbon. In both Vanguard Cities, Housing First programs provide long-term housing and multidisciplinary, person-centered support, with high retention rates and plans for geographical expansion. Delivered through strong collaboration with NGOs and civil society, the initiatives underscore the importance of cross-sector partnerships in the homelessness response. With this approach, housing serves as the foundation, while comprehensive support makes it sustainable. 

Innovative Housing Initiatives 

Even in financial and infrastructure-constrained contexts, the evidence shows that housing solutions often cost less per person than shelters and deliver better long-term outcomes. Some innovative approaches are upgrading and refurbishing existing buildings, expanding social and community housing, bringing vacant properties back into use, and providing rental vouchers and subsidies. 

For example, the Vila Reencontro program in São Paulo, Brazil, moves beyond large shelters by offering family-centered, private modular units. After a flexible two-year period, families receive rental subsidies to support long-term housing stability. 

Lived-Experience 

Effective solutions require meaningful collaboration at every level of the homelessness system, involving people with lived experiences who can identify gaps in services, strengthen programs to meet real needs, and shape policies through leadership, advisory, peer support, research, and program design. True partnership means sharing power and ensuring experts by experience are active decision-makers, not just symbolic participants. 

Across the Vanguard Cities, people with lived experience are shaping solutions from the Collective NITEP and Casa de Sueños in Uruguay, to the Ulziit-Asar Shelter in Mongolia, É Um Restaurante in Lisbon, and a co-developed prevention plan in Greater Manchester. 

System-Wide Responses 

Finally, ending homelessness requires coordinated, city-wide frameworks that bring services, policies, and partners together. Key building elements include: 

  • Understanding community housing needs 
  • Strong prevention and support policies 
  • Integrated, comprehensive services 
  • Data-driven decision-making and monitoring 
  • Cross-sector collaboration across government, NGOs, business, and communities 

Cities like Buenos Aires, Glasgow, and Sydney are conducting ongoing system reviews to strengthen their responses. Others are tailoring support for specific groups, such as older adults in Tshwane and people living in encampments in Chicago, showing the power of city-wide systems to adapt and respond. 

Overall, the IGH Case Studies report underscores that meaningful progress is possible when approaches are grounded in evidence, adapted to local contexts, and built on strong collaboration. Combining these five pillars, homelessness response should incorporate a strong emphasis on prevention, Housing First and housing-led strategies, lived experiences, and effective city leadership, combined with broad multi-sectoral coordination.

Read the blog in Spanish here/Lee el blog en español aquí: https://ighomelessness.org/lecciones-desde-las-ciudades-vanguardia

Pilares para acabar y prevenir el sinhogarismo: Lecciones desde las Ciudades Vanguardia

Pilares para acabar y prevenir el sinhogarismo: Lecciones desde las Ciudades Vanguardia 

En todo el mundo, las ciudades se enfrentan al desafío urgente de cómo acabar con la falta de vivienda. Aunque los contextos varían en función de los mercados inmobiliarios locales, los sistemas de protección social, las estructuras gubernamentales y las condiciones sociales, los principios fundamentales para prevenir y acabar con la falta de vivienda son los mismos. Resulta esencial que los sistemas pasen de gestionar las crisis a adoptar soluciones más sostenibles. A lo largo de todo el mundo, las Ciudades Vanguardia de IGH están realizando esfuerzos para poner fin y prevenir el sinhogarismo. Varias de estas iniciativas están documentadas en nuestro informe de 2026, Estudios de caso de las Ciudades Vanguardia: Iniciativas para prevenir y acabar con el sinhogarismo, que busca utilizar los conocimientos locales para orientar enfoques globales.  

El informe de casos prácticos recoge los enfoques desarrollados por once de nuestras Ciudades Vanguardia, incluyendo Buenos Aires, Chicago, Glasgow, Gran Mánchester, Mongolia, Lisboa, Santiago, São Paulo, Sídney, Tshwane y Uruguay. A partir de estos ejemplos del mundo real, este blog analiza los factores clave que han propiciado el avance de los programas y comparte evidencias internacionales, destacando cinco elementos imprescindibles en la respuesta al sinhogarismo para lograr un impacto significativo y duradero. 

Cinco pilares para el progreso 

Prevención 

La prevención es clave para acabar con el sinhogarismo. Para que sea efectiva, la prevención debe abordar las causas subyacentes de la falta de vivienda y brindar apoyo a las personas antes de que pierdan sus hogares. En la práctica, las estrategias preventivas pueden incluir, pero no estar limitadas a: 

  • evitar que las personas terminen en situación de calle luego de salir de instituciones 
  • prevenir los desalojos
  • proporcionar ayuda para el alquiler y asistencia financiera 
  • facilitar el acceso a la vivienda, la salud y los servicios de apoyo 
  • implementar enfoques de Vivienda Primero y enfocados en la vivienda 
  • ampliar la oferta de vivienda asequible

Los Estudios de caso de IGH destacan el servicio Pathfinder de Gran Mánchester, el que demuestra el impacto de los esfuerzos de prevención con jóvenes en riesgo de quedarse sin hogar. Este programa muestra cómo las estrategias basadas en datos, adaptadas a las necesidades individuales e integradas con servicios de vivienda y de apoyo más amplios, pueden conducir a resultados e intervenciones más eficaces. 

Vivienda Primero 

Al mismo tiempo, las Ciudades Vanguardia están replanteándose cómo se ofrece la vivienda. El modelo Vivienda Primera ha sido reconocido internacionalmente como uno de los mejores y más efectivos enfoques para abordar y prevenir el sinhogarismo. Los principios de este modelo establecen que no debe haber condiciones para recibir asistencia y se oponen al modelo de escalera, que implica una serie de etapas sucesivas que las personas deben seguir. En cambio, Vivienda Primero ofrece acceso inmediato a una vivienda permanente, junto con un apoyo flexible, personalizado y centrado en la persona. 

Los principios de este modelo han sido adaptados a los contextos locales de Santiago de Chile y Lisboa. En ambas Ciudades Vanguardia, los programas de Vivienda Primero proporcionan alojamiento a largo plazo y un apoyo multidisciplinario y centrado en la persona, con altas tasas de retención y planes de expansión geográfica. Implementadas a través de una sólida colaboración con ONG y la sociedad civil, las iniciativas enfatizan la importancia de las alianzas intersectoriales en la respuesta a la falta de vivienda. Con este enfoque, la vivienda sirve como base, mientras que el apoyo integral la hace sostenible. 

Iniciativas de vivienda innovadoras 

Incluso en contextos con limitaciones financieras y de infraestructura, los datos demuestran que las soluciones de vivienda suelen ser menos costosas por persona que los albergues y ofrecen mejores resultados a largo plazo. Algunos enfoques innovadores consisten en rehabilitar y renovar edificios existentes, ampliar la oferta de vivienda social y comunitaria, volver a poner en uso propiedades desocupadas y proporcionar vales de alquiler y subsidios. 

Como un ejemplo, el programa Vila Reencontro en São Paulo, Brasil, va más allá de los refugios de alta capacidad al ofrecer unidades modulares privadas dirigidas a familias. Tras un período flexible de dos años, las familias reciben subsidios de alquiler para apoyar la estabilidad de la vivienda a largo plazo. 

Experiencia de vida 

Las soluciones eficaces requieren una colaboración significativa en todos los niveles del sistema de atención a las personas en situación de calle, involucrando personas con experiencia vivida, quienes pueden identificar las deficiencias en los servicios, fortalecer los programas para satisfacer las necesidades reales y dar forma a las políticas a través del liderazgo, el asesoramiento, el apoyo entre pares, la investigación y el diseño de programas. Una verdadera alianza implica compartir el poder y garantizar que expertos por experiencia participen activamente de la toma de decisiones y no sean solo colaboradores simbólicos. 

A lo largo de las Ciudades Vanguardia, las personas con experiencia vivida están influenciando soluciones, desde el Colectivo NITEP y Casa de Sueños en Uruguay, hasta el Refugio Ulziit-Asar en Mongolia, É Um Restaurante en Lisboa y el plan de prevención desarrollado conjuntamente en Gran Mánchester. 

Respuestas a nivel de sistema 

Por último, para acabar con el sinhogarismo se requieren marcos coordinados a nivel de ciudad que unifiquen servicios, políticas y partes interesadas. Entre los elementos clave para el desarrollo de estas respuestas se incluyen: 

  • Comprender las necesidades de vivienda de la comunidad 
  • Políticas sólidas de prevención y apoyo 
  • Servicios integrados e integrales 
  • Toma de decisiones y seguimiento basados en datos 
  • Colaboración intersectorial entre el gobierno, las ONG, las empresas y las comunidades 

Ciudades como Buenos Aires, Glasgow y Sídney están llevando a cabo revisiones continuas de sus sistemas para fortalecer sus respuestas. Otras están adaptando el apoyo dirigido a grupos específicos, como las personas mayores en Tshwane y las personas que viven en campamentos en Chicago, lo que demuestra el poder de los sistemas a nivel de toda la ciudad para adaptarse y responder. 

En general, el informe de estudios de caso de IGH enfatiza que es posible lograr avances significativos cuando los enfoques se basan en la evidencia, se adaptan a los contextos locales y se construyen sobre una colaboración sólida. Combinando estos cinco pilares, la respuesta al sinhogarismo debe incorporar un fuerte énfasis en la prevención, estrategias de Vivienda Primero y centradas en la vivienda, experiencias vividas y un liderazgo municipal eficaz, junto con una amplia coordinación multisectorial. 

Lee el blog en inglés aquí/Read the blog in English here: https://ighomelessness.org/lessonsfromvanguardcities